A Small Digression on "Politics?"

.

You know what really grinds my cogs?
When people call the circumlocutions politicians do, "politics".
"They never answered the question! They just talked around it!"
"Oh, well that's politics"
This kind of complacency is pathetic.

Sure, we attempt to rectify these prevarications by picking/concatenating to one short gem out of hours of speeches and superimpose them in impact font on an innocuous, high quality picture, but this does nothing; it may appear to have an effect, since they're capitalizing on it, but again, it does nothing. "Politicians" don't browse Memebase, DamnLoL, Funnyjunk, or any websites like that all day, or possibly ever. (What the fuck do they do all day?)
No.

"Vanus", am I right?

No.
NO.
NO.
This is not politics! This is being afraid!
Being afraid, to tell the truth.

As much as I'd love to say politicians should simply resort to one-worded answers, politics and things beyond politics are not that simple. You know this, I know this, the aliens hiding on the obverse side of Venus know this.
Now, as an upstanding member of society, subscribed to a rather steadfast oath of veracity for multiple reasons, I can assure you that I am an expert on tergiversation and prevarication, and also public gesticulation. But come on, this has just gotten ridiculous. Asking any legitimate question now automatically warrants a lugubrious and arduously scripted response filled with irrelevant trivialities and impertinent superficialities. Am I saying that politicians should simply cut down their answers into soundbites as to save that guy at CNN's workload every other day? No. Fuck that guy, he owes me 20 bucks.

What are we to do?

Fuck if I know. I get multitudes of emails and Facebook posts daily claiming signing something will procure some result desired of some asshole in Washington. Of these updates, I'm typically only told of one or two successes. I don't know, I'm rather pessimistic about the whole thing, I feel like the protagonist of The Great Gatsby sometimes when it comes to the issue of (at least) American politics. I don't know how well your countries can handle it, I've not all the time in the world to read the few resources I'm capable of accessing (Le Monde, Sveriges Radio, Dradio, NRK, СИТИ-FM), but I'm sure you've your share of somnambulist-engendering "speeches" for simple questions that any average person can answer in one word. I ate a booger thinking it was a chip once. Politicians now, in America, simply aren't what they used to be. The multitude of them are anachronisms from an era they weren't even born in. And now the political spectrum has become so discombobulated and stratified, that if there is a crossover in ideology, members of these sides will intentionally sabotage and capitulate their ideologies simply in order to remain whatever political affiliation they ascribe to. People have become so polarized in general that it's quite nearly impossible to forge a common ground, let alone meet on it.

Now, believe me (DO IT) when I say, I've heard some stupid ideological principles and ideas, but the real stupidity regarding holding these ideals is holding them with some sort of iron vice likable to a jealous anaconda's date. People change, societies evolve, dogs shit on your carpet, cats sit on your keyboard, and ideas are fluid waiting to be molded into something. I know there are things I believed when I was 14 that I no longer believe, and promulgate (I wrote a decree) it embarrassing to even be associated with ever believing such nonsense. (I used to believe the light in the refrigerator turned off after you closed the door, I've recently discovered that there was no light, it's all in your head.) There are things we look back on that are simply cringe-worthy. Most atheist's/atheists' coming-of-age is typically rife with "righteous" indignation and "imposed" angst. I know mine was. God never answered my prayers for snow-days. Fuck You. And there are some ideas I held throughout my middle and high school (Primary and Secondary) years that are simply repugnant to me now. (One of them is more of a lexical discrepancy.)
Most conservatives claim that being liberal is only a phase, that erodes away after more (extensive) experience(s) with the "lower classes" (actual quote I've seen). Albeit this is true for some people, it holds not for all. I wouldn't say I've become more conservative in my ideologies, I don't prefer to interpose myself in the spectrums we've now for such affairs, but I can attest to my disillusionments being more aimed to (not at) the "liberal" side of things.

My Major "Gripe" with Contemporary Political Commentary and Discourse

We can't agree on jack shit.

The news networks, the "talking heads", the inferior-to-mine blogs, your parents, your friends, even your pet salamander, no one is safe from our indelible arrogances and belief systems. Especially with religion, but that's for another digression. So why should I care about another's beliefs? "To each their own, right?" No, fuck you, you imbecilic apologist. "To each their own" is just a euphemistic way of saying, "I think your likes are shit/beliefs are stupid and am not willing to argue further on the matter in case I secretly agree with you or vice versa. Dick." You see, they're isn't any "moderation" or "middle-ground" anymore. You're either a "Socialist Commie Muslim" or a "White Christian Upstanding Citizen" now. You can't agree with a point a conservative makes without being an "idiot" or agree with one point a liberal makes without being called a "socialist". There are points raised by both sides that are legitimate and worth considering (and we all know which side has more), but it's impossible to hold onto these points without having someone completely disregard your opinion for having some slice of one ideology's pie and having another. Fatass.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go masturbate to pictures of shemales and convincing crossdressers.

120 out of 535 arbitrary old fucks.

Witty Catchphrase

Unrelated Shit: "Unrelated Shit"

Hello Friends, Freunde, Amis, Друзья, Cairde, Vänner,

I thought I'd take this instance of the "Unrelated Shit" segment to provide informative graphics that elucidate things I could never expound upon from life experiences successfully, since I suck at reading/understanding people's idiosyncrasies and languages (body and diction).

  

From life experiences, particularly the last two relationships, both resulting in the women claiming I am awful at those languages.

(As if I give a fuck)

That's silly, however.

The, "I don't give a fuck about what other people think about me" attitude. 

It's a rather jejune mindset, most people use it in a jocular manner, of course, but almost every jest has eyes of truth behind them.

You should give a damn about what other people think about you.

I'm not going to say the cliché bullshit "In the real world, blah fucking blah", or "Once you get a job, I'm a fucking cunt yadda yadda yadda", I'm going to keep it simple.

Peoples' opinions do matter.

We wouldn't have an entire cultural distortion resulting from it, a culture of freedom of expression versus the counter-culture of apathetic indifference to things that might actually matter, if we really didn't care.

The entirety of our youths are dedicated to receiving other peoples' opinions and instructions. Out of the ineluctable "teenage spirit" of rebellion and clashes of values, we rebel against this norm we've had to endure, sometimes painfully, for the majority of our youth; but what truly, are we committing in this act? Sure, it's a "power trip", we're simply taking advantage of the new liberties we receive in the approach to adulthood. But are we doing it the right way?
Of course not. Nobody immediately assumes power and uses it the right way. You don't pick up a gun for the first time and hit dead-center nine bullets in a row.

(You'll probably end up jacking your shoulder or your wrist like I did.)

So of course, I know you're lying, or sitting there, early in the ungodly hours or late in the night at the mall because your lady-friend decided she wanted some clothes, and you need entertainment as you sit there, waiting "eagerly" to voice your opinion which you know she will ignore, wondering, "Holy shit, how did he know that?", but seriously, you're probably wondering, "Well why should I give a shit about your opinion, random American blogger?" Well, that's your decision. But it's a powerful decision. If you heed my advice (or you're a mature enough person to already be living as such), you'll learn so much more about other people, and yourself, if you just listen, to what they have to say.

Not "hear", "listen".

Sure, you can disregard my opinion entirely, I cannot change that, and you can simply disregard the opinions of everyone else, and live the rest of your life as some teenage girl who tweets about how annoying everyone else is, and how that no one has a "life" but her, or you can live a life that still revolves around you, but in such a way that you wish to improve yourself on what other people say, not to appease them, but to satisfy yourself, and to really understand and dedicate yourself for what you really want to be, and achieve.

Full Size

Amazing how such subtle mannerisms and gesticulations can hint so much, is it not?

There is so much written in one's countenance, their past, their present, and their perceptions of their future. They mean not to evince so much toward(s) anyone else, but it can, and will, always come through. Even I, one of the most stoic individuals, display such subtleties as to betray my emotions or thoughts. Usually they match my face. I.e. nothing. Of course, body language is the department I am "lacking" in, according to my last girlfriend. But that's mainly because I look like I just don't care. But hey, at least I'm honest!

Full Size

Sure wish I had a damned clue about music so I could do something about this. Hopefully you can, however. I just play random notes on a piano sometimes, no sheets or anything, just play around, really. It helps for dexterity, never a hindrance.

Full Size

One of the tougher questions anyone can ask themselves, for this question directly affects their perspectives of their (post) mortality.Given facts to the contrary, of course, usually leads to a dissonance that never ends well. This is a major reason I say, "listen", and not "hear". It never hurts to try and understand someone, unless dey tak liek diz.

So, really, what do you want out of life? 

Unrelated Shit: "The Real Enemy to Gay Marriage: Apathy"

April 1, 2001.

June 1, 2003.

June 30, 2005.

(Or June 8, 1901)

July 20, 2005.

November 30, 2006.

June 17, 2008.

May 1st, 2009.

December 21, 2009.

(Ceremony in Mexico City, but recognized throughout country)

June 5, 2010.

June 27, 2010.

July 22, 2010.

June 7, 2012.

These are the dates that Gay Marriage was legalized in these countries.

And these are the states in the United States of America that have legalized, within their jurisdiction, Gay Marriage.

This is not a piece on how we can "fix" gay marriage, or achieve equality for those seeking it, but how we can fix ourselves, if we really want to help the movement.

Recently, Chick-Fil-A came under fire again for the current owners' comments on gay marriage, and their support for one of the 8 different types of "Biblical Marriages". Now, if I remember correctly, this same event(s) occurred in the beginning of 2010-2011, when an "independent operator in Pennsylvania supplied food to an event sponsored by a group formed to defeat same-sex marriage initiatives"; and when it was also reported "that Chick-fil-A's WinShape Foundation did not admit gay couples to marriage counseling."

The title I've attributed to this piece is the message I am aiming for, Gay Marriage's greatest enemy is not the Christian Right, Fundamentalist Islam, Gang Violence, Migrating Beavers, or Gazelle Stampedes, it's us. We are letting it down, again and again. This generation is acting under the assumption that rights for minorities that are ostracized and attacked can be petitioned into legislation, that rights can be achieved in one lifetime, or even a decade.

The first slaves were brought to North America in 1619, it took nearly 345 years before they even got to enjoy some of the liberties they have, and we have, today: desegregation, equal opportunity schooling, and equal opportunity voting.

Now. "People" always complain about the next generation. Always. This is not new, "Roarin' Twenties" and the 30's had the flappers, the 50's the beatniks, the 60's the civil rights activists, the 70's the hippies, the 80's the metalheads, the 90's the "grunge generation", and finally, we've the millenials. The real problem people have with this generation, is not so much that they're desensitized to so much via the news, ungrateful for all the things they have, or that they're fucking stupid, the underlying factor that this is all stems from, that is shown time and time again in their failings, is that they just don't care. The flappers were fighting for womens' rights, the beatniks were fighting for freedom of expression (somewhat), the civil rights activists were earning their name, the hippies wanted to end Vietnam and spread peace, the metalheads just wanted to lighten up the place and enjoy themselves, and the grunge were a bunch of whiny little teenagers with terrible fashion sense, but, they cared.

What have we now? Sure, they're ungrateful:

And quite possibly largely stupid compared to the rest of the modern world:

Yet this all is exemplified by an earlier "travesty" committed this year:

They don't care enough.

And for those who do, it's the "wrong" way.

No not the Hell part, the Boner part, damn hormones in foods.

It's a peculiar phenomenon, exemplified best by this: 

I always hear this argument:

Why does it matter what these people do, it doesn't affect you, it's not your problem! This isn't an issue that affects you!

This argument is ignorant, and it obviously just doesn't work. 

It's extremely obvious that they are making it their issue; and that they are using this philosophy to their advantage. Advocates are using the "Apathy" approach, or under it's euphemistic terminology, the "Live and Let Live" philosophy. Yes, this is a good philosophy, when the actions are legal (Not moral or anything abstract, simply legal). But when it is being used for advocating for a legalization of anything, it fails horribly, because the advocates, using the politically correct "apathy" approach, i.e. pretending to ignore it, are fighting against people who actually care about the outcome of the legalization, it's like Europeans fighting for womens' rights in Southwest Asia, it's the "Live and Let Live" (Europe is one of the worst victims of the "Political Correctness Disease") argument, yet they are fighting against a culture that has oppressed them for millenia, one that seriously cares about the outcome.

I'm not claiming I'm perfect, (I am), or that you are a terrible sack of shit for possibly not caring enough (You probably are), I'm claiming, that in order for Gay Marriage to become a federal reality in the United States, we need to stop tolerating intolerance. 

We need to care more than the other people, who have obviously made it their problem.

We need to be more informed, trying to save Gay Rights, or promulgate them in the first place, requires knowledge of what is being supported.

And lastly, We, the People, need to recognize, need to care, need to understand, and need to "Live and Let Live", but most importantly, we need to fight for that right.


Witty Catchphrase

Thanks for reading.